Abstract: "Uranium from Africa has long been a major source of fuel for nuclear power and atomic weapons, including the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. In 2003, after the infamous “yellow cake from Niger,” Africa suddenly became notorious as a source of uranium, a component of nuclear weapons. But did that admit Niger, or any of Africa's other uranium-producing countries, to the select society of nuclear states? Does uranium itself count as a nuclear thing? In this book, Gabrielle Hecht lucidly probes the question of what it means for something—a state, an object, an industry, a workplace—to be “nuclear.”
Hecht shows that questions about being nuclear—a state that she calls “nuclearity”—lie at the heart of today's global nuclear order and the relationships between “developing nations” (often former colonies) and “nuclear powers” (often former colonizers). Hecht enters African nuclear worlds, focusing on miners and the occupational hazard of radiation exposure. Could a mine be a nuclear workplace if (as in some South African mines) its radiation levels went undetected and unmeasured? With this book, Hecht is the first to put Africa in the nuclear world, and the nuclear world in Africa. By doing so, she remakes our understanding of the nuclear age."
Gabrielle Hecht, "Hecht, Gabrielle. 2012. Being Nuclear: Africans and the Global Uranium Trade.", contributed by Angela Okune, STS Infrastructures, Platform for Experimental Collaborative Ethnography, last modified 7 August 2018, accessed 21 November 2024. https://stsinfrastructures.org/content/hecht-gabrielle-2012-being-nuclear-africans-and-global-uranium-trade
Critical Commentary
AO: This 2012 book by Gabrielle Hecht looks at uranium mining in Gabon and Madagascar and interrogates the nuclear/ non-nuclear distinctions being made. She reveals a range of disjointed socio-technical practices where “nuclearity, colonialism and decolonization confronted and shaped one another” and notes how at various sites and in different ways, colonial power relations were “conjugated” into distinctive technological futures. She argues that we must study more than just rhetorical shifts and look at the actual material effects of these distinctions.