A Pinch of Necropolitics





Creative Commons Licence



Created date

July 12, 2018


Critical Commentary

Perhaps the best known scholar of the necropolitical Achille Mbembe states,

...the ultimate expression of sovereignty resides, to a large degree, in the power and the capacity to dictate who may live and who must die. Hence, to kill or to allow to live constitute the limits of sovereignty, its  fundamental attributes. To exercise sovereignty is to exercise control over mortality and to define life as the deployment and manifestation of power" (11-12)

On the difference between necropolitics and biopolitics, Mbembe writes:

...under what practical conditions is the right to kill, to allow to live, or to expose to death exercised? Who is the subject of this right? What does the implementation of such a right tell us about the person who is thus put to death and about the relation of enmity that sets that person against his or her murderer? Is the notion of biopower sufficient to account for the contemporary ways in which the political, under the guise of war, of resistance, or of the fight against terror, makes the murder of the enemy its primary and absolute objective? War, after all, is as much a means of achieving sovereignty as a way of exercising the right to kill. Imagining politics as a form of war, we must ask: What place is given to life, death, and the human body (in particular the wounded or slain body)? How are they inscribed in the order of power?" (12)

Mbembé, J-A., and Libby Meintjes. "Necropolitics." Public culture 15, no. 1 (2003): 11-40.


Photo taken by Hined Rafeh and Alli Morgan

Group Audience